Natech风险管理中的承灾体脆弱性评估方法综述*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.11.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探明在Natech环境下评估承灾体脆弱性的方法以及发展方向,从关联性和不确定性2方面出发,归纳总结出评估方法的研究现状、主要应用场景以及在应用中存在的缺陷及其展望。研究结果表明:从研究方向来看,现有研究多集中于物理脆弱性,而针对社会脆弱性研究较少;从研究方法来看,事故树、领结图和贝叶斯网络可展现原因与后果的关联性;回归模型可给出各原因导致事故的占比,发现脆弱性升级的根源;贝叶斯网络与模糊理论的结合使脆弱性的估计更准确,但与Rapid-N方法一样,缺少系统的研究,未被广泛用于Natech风险评估中。

关键词: Natech, 脆弱性, 风险评估, 关联性, 不确定性

Abstract: In order to explore assessment method of vulnerability for hazard bearing bodies and its development direction under Natech environment, research status, main application scenarios, existing defects and prospects of evaluation methods were summarized from perspectives of relevance and uncertainty. The results show that from the aspect of research direction, existing research mainly focuses on physical vulnerability rather than social and urban vulnerability. Then, from that of research methods, fault trees, bow-tie diagrams and Bayesian network can show correlation between causes and consequences. Additionally, regression model can calculate proportion of accidents caused by each reason and find out roots of vulnerability upgrade. Due to lack of systematic studies, although its combination of Bayesian network and simulation system makes estimation of vulnerability more accurate, the method has not been widely used in Natech risk assessment.

Key words: Natech, vulnerability, risk assessment, relevance, uncertainty

中图分类号:

X915.5

蔡玫, 王秋寒. Natech风险管理中的承灾体脆弱性评估方法综述^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 9-17.

CAI Mei, WANG Qiuhan. Review of hazard bearing bodies' vulnerability assessment methods in Natech risk management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 9-17.

参考文献

[1] CRED EM-DAT: the international disaster database[EB/OL]. [2019-09-09].https://public.emdat.be/mapping.
[2] 华敏,蒋代,潘旭海,等. NaTech事件中泄漏致多米诺效应风险分析[J]. 南京工业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 41(5):561-569.
HUA Min, JIANG Dai, PAN Xuhai, et al. Risk analysis of domino effect of leakage in NaTech events [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology:Natural Science Edition,2019,41(5):561-569.
[3] 黄孔星,陈国华,曾涛,等. 化工园区Na-Tech事件定量风险评价与防控体系评述[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(7): 3 482-3 494.
HUANG Kongxing, CHEN Guohua, ZENG Tao, et al. Review of quantitative risk assessment and pre-control system of Na-Tech event in chemical industry Park[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(7): 3 482-3 494.
[4] 郭跃. 灾害易损性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 灾害学, 2005, 20(4): 92-96.
GUO Yue. Review of the research on hazard vulnerability[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2005, 20(4): 92-96.
[5] 区至培. 美国战争的脆弱性[J]. 世界知识, 1951(23):20.
[6] 张文柳,张杰. 环渤海地区水旱灾害经济损失评价[J]. 灾害学, 2005,20(2): 71-76.
ZHANG Wenliu, ZHANG Jie. Evaluation of economic loss of flood and drought damage in Baohai rim[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2005,20(2): 71-76.
[7] 石勇. 灾害情景下城市脆弱性评估研究:以上海市为例[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2010 .
SHI Yong. Research on vulnerability assessment of cities on the disaster scenario: a case study of Shanghai city[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2010.
[8] 邵秋芳,彭培好,黄洁,等. 长江上游安宁河流域生态环境脆弱性遥感监测[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2016, 28(2): 175-181.
SHAO Qiufang, PENG Peihao, HUANG Jie, et al. Monitoring eco-environmental vulnerability in Anning river basin in the upper reaches of the Yangtze river using remote sensing techniques[J]. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2016, 28(2): 175-181.
[9] 余中元,李波,张新时. 湖泊流域社会生态系统脆弱性时空演变及调控研究:以滇池为例[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(2): 110-116.
YU Zhongyuan, LI Bo, ZHANG Xinshi. Study of time-space evolution and control of vulnerability of lake basin social ecological system: a case of the Dianchi lake[J]. Human Geography, 2015, 30(2): 110-116.
[10] 龚新梅,马媛,桂东伟,等. 干旱区典型流域天然草地生态脆弱性评价研究[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 34(2): 216-220.
GONG Xinmei, MA Yuan, GUI Dongwei, et al. The ecological fragility appraisal of the natural meadow in a typical basin of arid area[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Science & Technology Edition, 2007, 34(2): 216-220.
[11] 郭跃. 自然灾害的社会易损性及其影响因素研究[J]. 灾害学, 2010, 25(1): 84-88.
GUO Yue. A study on social vulnerability to natural hazards and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2010, 25(1): 84-88.
[12] 聂承静,杨林生,李海蓉. 中国地震灾害宏观人口脆弱性评估[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(3): 375-382.
NIE Chengjing, YANG Linsheng, LI Hairong. Macro assessment of seismic population vulnerability in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(3): 375-382.
[13] 刘绿柳. 水资源脆弱性及其定量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2002(2): 41-44.
LIU Lyuliu. Concept and quantitive assessment of vulnerability of water resource[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002(2): 41-44.
[14] 宋志立. 贫困脆弱性研究文献综述[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2013(25): 184-186.
[15] 苏飞,张平宇. 基于集对分析的大庆市经济系统脆弱性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(4): 454-464.
SU Fei, ZHANG Pingyu. Vulnerability assessment of petroleum city's economic system based on set pair analysis: a case study of Daqing city[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(4): 454-464.
[16] 方创琳,王岩. 中国城市脆弱性的综合测度与空间分异特征[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 234-247.
FANG Chuanglin, WANG Yan. A comprehensive assessment of urban vulnerability and its spatial differentiation in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 234-247.
[17] 王军武,吴寒,杨庭友. 基于投影寻踪的地铁车站工程暴雨内涝脆弱性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019,29(9):1-7.
WANG Junwu, WU Han, YANG Tingyou. Vulnerability assessment of rainfall and waterlogging in subway stations based on projection pursuit model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(9):1-7.
[18] 徐君,李贵芳,王育红. 国内外资源型城市脆弱性研究综述与展望[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(6): 1 266-1 278.
XU Jun, LI Guifang, WANG Yuhong. Review and prospect of resource-based city vulnerability in China and Abroad[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(6): 1 266-1 278.
[19] 张晓莹. 《国际科学理事会非洲科学计划—全球环境变化》汉译实践报告[D].青岛:山东科技大学, 2018.
ZHANG Xiaoying. Report on E-C translation practice of ICSU ROA science plan-global environmental change[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2018.
[20] 陈萍,陈晓玲. 全球环境变化下人-环境耦合系统的脆弱性研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(4): 454-462.
CHEN Ping, CHEN Xiaoling. Summary on research of coupled human-environment system vulnerability under global environmental change[J]. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29(4): 454-462.
[21] 王春乙,张继权,霍治国,等. 农业气象灾害风险评估研究进展与展望[J]. 气象学报, 2015, 73(1): 1-19.
WANG Chunyi, ZHANG Jiquan, HUO Zhiguo, et al. Prospects and progresses in the research of risk assessment of agro-meteorological disasters[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2015, 73(1): 1-19.
[22] 倪长健. 论自然灾害风险评估的途径[J]. 灾害学, 2013, 28(2): 1-5.
NI Changjian. Discussion on the approaches of natural disaster risk assessment[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2013, 28(2): 1-5.
[23] 魏建波,赵文吉,关鸿亮,等. 基于GIS的区域干旱灾害风险区划研究:以武陵山片区为例[J]. 灾害学, 2015, 30(1): 198-204.
WEI Jianbo, ZHAO Wenji, GUAN Hongliang, et al. A zoning study of region drought disaster risk based on GIS: the case of Wuling mountain area[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015, 30(1): 198-204.
[24] 刘晓然,苏经宇,王威,等. 城市抗震防灾能力评估的系统动力学模型[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2013, 22(5): 71-76.
LIU Xiaoran, SU Jingyu, WANG Wei, et al. System dynamics model of urban earthquake disaster resistance and prevention capacity evaluation[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2013, 22(5): 71-76.
[25] NECCI A, ANTONIONI G, COZZANI V, et al. A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 115:91-99.
[26] 颜峻,左哲. 自然灾害风险评估指标体系及方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010,20(11):61-65.
YAN Jun, ZUO Zhe. Research on natural disaster risk assessment index system and method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010,20(11):61-65.
[27] WHITE G F. Natural hazards, local, national, global[J]. American Geographical Society, 1976, 66(2):247-249.
[28] KIRSTIN D. Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change[J]. Geoforum, 1992, 23(3):417-436.
[29] CUTTER S L. Vulnerability to environment hazards[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1996, 20(4):529-539.
[30] TAMARO A, CRIMAZ S, SANTULIN M, et al. Characterization of the expected seismic damage for a critical infrastructure: the case of the oil pipeline in Friuli Venezia Giulia (NE Italy)[J]. Bull Earthquake Eng, 2008,16:1 425-1 445.
[31] CRUZ A M, KRAUSMANN E, FRANCHELLO G. Analysis of tsunami impact scenarios at an oil refinery[J]. Nat Hazards, 2011,58:141-162.
[32] KHAKZAD N, DADASHZADEH M, RENIERS G. Quantitative assessment of wildfire risk in oil facilities[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 223:433-443.
[33] KHAKZAD N, GELDER P V. Fragility assessment of chemical storage tanks subject to floods[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 111:75-84.
[34] KHAKZAD N, GELDER P V . Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced Natechs: a Bayesian network approach[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, 169:403-411.
[35] NADERPOUR M, KHAKZAD N . Texas LPG fire: domino effects triggered by natural hazards[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 116:354-364.
[36] CRUZ A M, OKADA N . Methodology for preliminary assessment of Natech risk in urban areas[J]. Natural Hazards, 2008, 46(2):199-220.
[37] HAJJ C E, PIATYSZEK E, TARDY A, et al. Development of generic bow-tie diagrams of accidental scenarios triggered by flooding of industrial facilities (Natech)[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 36:72-83.
[38] GIORDANO E S, ELSA P, VALERIO C, et al. Analysis of the impact of wildland-urban-interface fires on LPG domestic tanks[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 124:1-15.
[39] GIRGIN S, KRAUSMANN E. Rapid-N: Rapid Natech risk assessment and mapping framework[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(6):949-960.
[40] 华敏,潘旭海,蒋军成,等. 化工园区储罐多米诺效应的脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019,29(4):177-182.
HUA Min, PAN Xuhai, JIANG Juncheng, et al. Vulnerability assessment of tanks in chemical industry park under domino effect[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(4):177-182.
[41] GUO Xiaoxue, JI Jie, FAISAL K, et al. Fuzzy Bayesian network based on an improved similarity aggregation method for risk assessment of storage tank accident[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020,144:242-252.

Natech风险管理中的承灾体脆弱性评估方法综述^*

Review of hazard bearing bodies' vulnerability assessment methods in Natech risk management

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘嘉豪, 余杨, 张振兴, 余建星, 王巍巍, 傅一钦. 二维云模型和贝叶斯网络的立管风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 147-154.
[2]	岳仁田, 张知波. 脆弱性多因素耦合作用下空管亚安全态识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 8-14.
[3]	辛保泉, 喻健良, 党文义, 白永忠, 于安峰. 定量风险评估视域下的多组分混合物危险特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 80-85.
[4]	卢颖, 赵志攀, 姜学鹏, 吴锦东, 范小鹏. 大数据视域下体育场馆动态火灾风险指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 155-162.
[5]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[6]	张鸽. 基于累积接尘量的尘肺病风险评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 200-206.
[7]	韩鹏, 王军, 王启, 赵嶷飞. 基于飞行剖面的航空器试飞活动空管风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 149-156.
[8]	刘继川, 桂蕾. 城市公共安全风险评估与控制对策研究:以武汉市为例^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 164-171.
[9]	辛保泉, 党文义, 喻健良, 王溪舸, 闫兴清, 卢卫. 石化过程蒸气云爆炸抗爆设防荷载定量评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 113-118.
[10]	张兆宁, 陈子辰, 卢飞. 配对进近侧向位置误差QAR参数关联性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 47-52.
[11]	路庆昌, 崔欣, 徐标, 刘鹏, 王琰. 公交接驳场景下轨道交通网络脆弱性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 141-146.
[12]	安宇, 李子琪, 王袆, 郭子萌, 张姜博南. 基于FBN的高校实验室不安全行为风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 160-167.
[13]	吴维讲师, 罗欣然, 魏明. 基于SD模型的跑道侵入风控网络脆弱性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 41-48.
[14]	马润, 仇维斌 , 秦云, 欧红香. 模糊区间TOPSIS动车组塞拉门故障风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 177-183.
[15]	赵冬月, 陈长坤, 易亮. 灾害演化网络时序性风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 171-177.